Current:Home > ContactNovaQuant-NYC will pay $17.5M to settle lawsuit alleging women were forced to remove hijabs in mugshots -ProfitPoint
NovaQuant-NYC will pay $17.5M to settle lawsuit alleging women were forced to remove hijabs in mugshots
Algosensey Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-11 08:29:34
NEW YORK – The NovaQuantcity agreed Friday to pay $17.5 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleged police officers forced two women to remove hijabs while mugshot photos were being taken, lawyers for the women said Friday.
The case, filed in 2018, stemmed from the arrests of Muslim American women Jamilla Clark and Arwa Aziz. In court records, they alleged New York City Police officers threatened them to remove their headscarves, and the two felt ashamed after being forced to do so.
New York City:NYPD officer shot, killed during traffic stop in Queens by suspect with prior arrests
“When they forced me to take off my hijab, I felt as if I were naked,” Clark said in a statement released by her lawyers and advocates. “I’m not sure if words can capture how exposed and violated I felt.”
The settlement announced Friday still requires approval by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in federal court in New York.
Clark and Aziz’s attorney, O. Andrew F. Wilson, said forcing someone to remove religious clothing is akin to a strip search. The women alleged the removal of their hijabs for booking photographs violated their First Amendment rights, as well as federal religious protections and state law.
“This is a milestone for New Yorkers’ privacy and religious rights,”said Albert Fox Cahn, executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, a civil rights group that provided legal representation for the plaintiffs. “The NYPD should never have stripped these religious New Yorkers of their head coverings and dignity. This wasn’t just an assault on their rights, but on everything our city claims to believe in."
In 2020, the New York City Police Department changed its policy as a response to the lawsuit, allowing people to be photographed with religious garb as long as their faces weren’t covered, the New York Times reported. Advocates supporting the lawsuit said the NYPD has practiced a policy of keeping mugshots as part of its facial recognition surveillance program.
The agreement maintains the city denied engaging in a pattern or process that deprived people of their protected rights, court records said. The city didn’t admit to the specific claims made by Clark and Aziz.
Nick Paolucci, a spokesperson for the New York City Law Department, said the resolution was in the best interest of all parties.
“This settlement resulted in a positive reform for the NYPD,” he said in a statement. “The agreement carefully balances the department’s respect for firmly held religious beliefs with the important law enforcement need to take arrest photos.”
Criminal justice:New York City police have to track the race of people they stop. Will others follow suit?
Clark and Aziz both wore hijabs in line with their Muslim faith, which covers a woman’s hair, ears and neck, but leaves her face exposed. Many observant Muslim women wear it at all times when they’re in the presence of men who aren’t part of their immediate family.
In January 2017, Clark said she wept with her hijab down around her shoulders at NYPD headquarters in Manhattan, and begged to put it back on, court records said. She said she had been arrested for violating an order of protection by her ex-husband, which she said was false.
Eight months later, in August, Aziz had her photo taken with her hijab at her neck, in a Brooklyn precinct after voluntarily turning herself over to NYPD for violating a protective order against her sister-in-law that she said she didn’t commit. She, too, cried during the photos that had to be taken in front of several male NYPD officers and over 30 men incarcerated, according to court records.
As part of the agreement, the city prepared a class list of people who had their religious head covering removed for an official NYPD photo, according to court records. Attorneys estimate the proposed settlement could make over 3,600 people eligible for payments between approximately $7,000 and $13,000. They encouraged anyone who had their head coverings removed for a mugshot between March 16, 2014 and Aug. 23, 2021 to also file.
“We send our appreciation to the Muslim women who bravely persisted with this litigation, prompting policy change that benefit many with similar religious garb requirements,” Afar Nasher, executive director of the civil rights group Council on American-Islamic Relations New York chapter, said in a statement.
Notices of the settlement would go out to people identified in police records. Information would be available in English and also in Arabic, Bengali, Spanish, Urdu and Hebrew.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Man cuffed but not charged after Chiefs’ Super Bowl rally shooting sues congressman over online post
- The Daily Money: No more sneaking into the Costco food court?
- West Virginia Gov. Justice breaks with GOP Legislature to veto bill rolling back school vaccine rule
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Millions in India are celebrating Holi. Here's what the Hindu festival of colors is all about.
- Settlement reached in lawsuit between Disney and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ allies
- Settlement reached in lawsuit between Disney and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ allies
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Princess Kate's cancer diagnosis highlights balancing act between celebrity and royals' private lives
Ranking
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Subaru recalls 118,000 vehicles due to airbag issue: Here's which models are affected
- President Biden to bring out the celebrities at high-dollar fundraiser with Obama, Clinton
- Robotic police dog shot multiple times, credited with avoiding potential bloodshed
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Texas Rep. Troy Nehls target of investigation by House ethics committee
- Baltimore bridge press conference livestream: Watch NTSB give updates on collapse
- Former Sen. Joe Lieberman, Democrats’ VP pick in 2000, dead at 82
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
What happened to Utah women's basketball team was horrible and also typically American
Media attorney warns advancing bill would create ‘giant loophole’ in Kentucky’s open records law
MLB owners unanimously approve sale of Baltimore Orioles to a group headed by David Rubenstein
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Massachusetts man gets 40 years in prison for fatal attack on partner on a beach in Maine
Heavy rains in Brazil kill dozens; girl rescued after more than 16 hours under mud
Ski town struggles to fill 6-figure job because candidates can't afford housing